|
VIOXX National Class Action
|
In the news:
|
- April 11,
2006 – NYT: Jury awards $9 Million in punitive damages against
Merck
- April 5,
2006 – Reuters: Jury awards $4.5 Million in Vioxx verdict
against Merck
- March 8, 2006 – Boston
Globe: Merck film urged sellers to fend off doctor's Vioxx queries
- March 8, 2006 – North Jersey
News: Vioxx video may aid plaintiffs
- March 8, 2006 – Boston
Globe: Merck disclosed Vioxx heart risks, court told
- March 7, 2006 – Boston
Globe: Trial over long-term Vioxx use begins
- February 25, 2006 –
Globe & Mail: Health Minister
attacks makers of Vioxx
- February 23, 2006 –
New York Times: Scientists Again Defend Study on Vioxx
- February
8, 2006 – St. John’s Telegram: Ontario ruling another step forward for Vioxx plaintiffs
- February
4, 2006 – Regina Leader Post: Firm loses bid to act in Ontario
- August 28, 2005 – The Daily
Telegraph: Merck will consider settling some Vioxx lawsuits
- August
22, 2005 – Globe and Mail: Liability trumps science at Merck
trial
- August
21, 2005 – New York Times: For Merck paper trail won’t go
away
- August 20,
2005 – Calgary Herald: Vioxx maker to pay $253M. Alberta
plaintiffs buoyed by Texas jury award
- August 20,
2005 – Calgary Sun: Vioxx verdict uplifts Calgary lawyers
- July 5,
2005 – LA Times: Merck Asks Judge to Postpone Vioxx Case
- July 5, 2005 – USA
Today: Merck to seek delay in
first Vioxx case
- July 5, 2005 – CNN:
Drug giant's lawyers say 'negative publicity' has hurt the company's
chances for a fair trial
- July 4, 2005 – Houston Chronicle:
Widow's suit against Vioxx maker to set tone for rest
- June 30, 2005 –
Newsday: Judge queries Vioxx suit lawyers over document leak
- February 25, 2005 –
Globe & Mail: Health Minister attacks makers of Vioxx
- January 25, 2005 –
Globe & Mail: Vioxx took deadly toll of more than 40,000 in US
alone
- January 23, 2005 –
Calgary Herald: Drug Troubles - Vioxx and the other COX-2 inhibitors
- January 23, 2005 –
Calgary Herald: Patients weigh risks of continued Vioxx use
- January 23, 2005 –
Calgary Herald: Patients are upset pain drugs taken away
- January 4, 2005 –
Calgary Herald: Vioxx safety data approved for release
- December 29, 2004 –
Boston Globe: Merck CEO to testify about Vioxx
- December 22, 2004 –
Calgary Sun: Alberta joins nationwide Vioxx lawsuit
- December 15, 2004 –
Philadelphia Inquirer: Merck to try to bar Vioxx class actions
- November 19, 2004 –
Los Angeles Times: Early alarms alleged long before VIOXX removed
- November 18, 2004
– Senate Hearings on Withdrawal of VIOXX: Testimony of Dr. Gurkirpal
Singh
- November 6, 2004 – The Lancet:
Unacceptable risks of Vioxx evident four years ago
- November 4, 2004 –
New York Times: Despite Warnings, Merck Took Long Path to Vioxx Recall
- November 1, 2004 –
Wall Street Journal: Merck Knew Vioxx's Dangers at Early Stage
- October 21, 2004 –
New England Journal of Medicine: Failing the Public Health —
Rofecoxib, Merck, and the FDA
- October 9, 2004 –
Calgary Herald: Vioxx victims file Alberta class action against Merck
- August 1, 2004 – Merck
Inc: Vioxx
Clinical Study
|
HOME

|
|